DAHS Performance Data

A Look at the Numbers from 2023-2024

65.8%
2024 Euthanasia Rate
1,741
Excess animal deaths vs. state average
4.7ร—
Higher euthanasia rate than Virginia average

The Numbers: How DAHS Compares to Other Virginia Shelters

Danville Area Humane Society operates with a 65.8% euthanasia rate as of 20241, compared to Virginia's state average of 14%2. This means DAHS euthanizes animals at a rate 51.8 percentage points higher than the state average, making it one of the worst-performing shelters in Virginia. The facility processes approximately 3,362 animals annually3 while serving as the primary open-admission shelter for Danville and surrounding regions.

Key Numbers for 2024

3,362 Animals processed (2024) 4
2,212 Animals euthanized
34.2% Live release rate
1,741 Excess deaths vs. state avg

Euthanasia Rates Over Time

DAHS vs. Virginia State Average (2019-2024)

Comparing DAHS to Similar Shelters

How DAHS Ranks in Virginia

DAHS maintains consistent placement among Virginia's five highest-euthanizing shelters since 20055. Among 43 open-admission shelters statewide, DAHS performance metrics place the facility in the bottom performance tier. The national average live release rate of 83%6 contrasts with DAHS's 34.2% rate, creating a 48.8 percentage point performance gap.

Virginia shelter performance distribution (2024 data):

Contracted Humane Societies
< 20%
12 of 15 facilities
Open-Admission Average
20%
Statewide average
DAHS Rate
65.8%
3.3ร— higher than peers

DAHS vs. Similar Shelters

Virginia Shelters Euthanasia Rates (2024)

Where the Animals Come From

Transfer animals constitute 37.1% of DAHS's total intake volume (1,249 of 3,362 animals in 2024)7, indicating the facility functions as a regional overflow management point. The organization rejected 1,085 animals from other shelters in 2023 (391 dogs, 694 cats)8, suggesting capacity constraints despite high euthanasia rates.

Annual intake patterns:

2024 3,362 total animals
2023 3,499 total animals
Transfer growth +17.3% 2023 to 2024

Intake Source Analysis

Local vs. Transfer Animals (2024)

Money and Resources

Where the Money Comes From

DAHS gets most of its money from a contract with the City of Danville, plus $3,950 per month from Pittsylvania County (which is ending soon)9. This funding structure creates operational constraints, with municipal contracts noted as insufficient for full operational coverage.

Funding Sources:

Primary
City of Danville Contract
Animal control services
Secondary
Pittsylvania County
$47,400 annually (ending soon)
Tertiary
Private Support
Donations and grants

Budget Impact: Staffing adjustments planned due to 15% revenue reduction from county contract termination

How Efficiently Does DAHS Operate?

The same director has run the shelter for 33 years10, which provides stability but may also mean resistance to change. Cost-per-animal metrics remain unavailable in public reporting, preventing efficiency benchmarking against peer facilities.

What We Don't Know:

  • No published cost-per-animal data
  • Limited financial reporting beyond basic filings
  • Absence of outcome-based budgeting metrics
  • No public reporting of donation allocation

What Happens to Dogs vs. Cats

What Happened to Different Animals in 2023

๐Ÿฑ

Feline Population

80%
Euthanasia Rate

Represents majority of intake volume

๐Ÿ•

Canine Population

70%
Euthanasia Rate

Higher transfer opportunities than felines

The 10 percentage point differential between species suggests varying operational approaches or resource allocation by animal type. This disparity indicates potential for targeted interventions, particularly for feline populations.

Dogs vs. Cats: Survival Rates

Euthanasia Rates by Animal Type (2023)

Signs of Improvement in 2024

Year-over-year performance shifts:

2023
77%
Baseline euthanasia rate
โ†’
2024
65.8%
Improved rate
=
Change
-11.2%
Percentage point improvement

This 11.2 percentage point reduction (a 14.5% relative improvement) indicates organizational capacity for operational change when resources align. However, the 2024 rate remains 4.7 times higher than state averages. Attribution to enhanced transfer partnerships suggests further improvement potential through expanded collaborations.

Red Flags in the Data

Numbers That Stand Out

37.1%
Transfer intake percentage

Exceeds typical shelter patterns, indicating regional overflow role

4.7ร—
State average multiple

Euthanasia rate indicates systemic operational issues

1,085
Animals rejected (2023)

High rejection volume despite high euthanasia rates

Warning Signs

Policy Contradiction

No intake restrictions policy combined with high euthanasia rates suggests assessment protocol gaps

Resource Mismatch

Regional overflow management role without corresponding resource allocation creates unsustainable operational pressure

Limited Adaptation

Six-year strategic plan update cycle indicates limited continuous improvement processes

The Gap Between DAHS and State Average

Measuring the cost of underperformance

Lives Lost Above State Average

The 51.8 percentage point gap from state standards represents approximately 1,741 excess animal deaths annually compared to expected outcomes at Virginia average performance levels14.

35
animals die for each percentage point above state average

Conclusion

DAHS continues to perform more than 50 percentage points worse than the state average. The facility's dual role as municipal shelter and regional overflow manager creates competing resource demands without commensurate funding structures. While 2024 improvements demonstrate organizational change capacity, current performance remains 4.7 times above state averages, showing that DAHS needs major changes to how it operates.

Key Findings Summary

๐Ÿ“Š

51.8 percentage point gap

From Virginia standards represents crisis-level performance

โš ๏ธ

~1,813 excess euthanasias annually

Compared to state average performance levels

๐Ÿพ

80% cat and 70% dog euthanasia rates

Far exceed peer shelters and national standards

๐Ÿ”„

37.1% transfer intake with 1,085 rejections

Indicates systemic intake and assessment issues

๐Ÿšจ

Systemic operational reform required

Performance gap too large for incremental improvements

The Path Forward

These data demonstrate that DAHS requires immediate, comprehensive operational reform. The 2024 improvements prove change is possible, but the current trajectory would require decades to reach acceptable standards. Danville's animals cannot wait that long.

Sources and References

Primary Data Sources

  1. 65.8% Euthanasia Rate (2024)
    Godanriver.com, "Danville animal shelter lowers euthanasia rate as another group continues no-kill push" (December 2024)
    View Source โ†’
  2. Virginia State Average 14%
    Cardinal News analysis citing Virginia state data (September 2024)
    View Source โ†’
  3. 3,362 Animals Processed (2024)
    Godanriver.com (December 2024)
    View Source โ†’
  4. Among Virginia's Five Highest-Euthanizing Shelters Since 2005
    DNRonline.com opinion piece (2018)
    View Source โ†’
  5. National Average 83% Live Release Rate
    Best Friends Animal Society national statistics
    View Source โ†’
  6. 37.1% Transfer Animals (1,249 of 3,362 in 2024)
    Godanriver.com (December 2024)
    View Source โ†’
  7. 1,085 Animals Rejected (391 dogs, 694 cats)
    Who Will Let the Dogs Out blog citing DAHS data
    View Source โ†’
  8. $3,950 Monthly Pittsylvania County Payment
    WSLS, "Danville Area Humane Society not expecting big financial impact when county funding stops"
    View Source โ†’
  9. 33-Year Directorial Tenure
    WDBJ7 (September 10, 2024) and multiple news reports
    View Source โ†’
  10. 80% Cat Euthanasia Rate, 70% Dog Euthanasia Rate
    Who Will Let the Dogs Out blog analysis
    View Source โ†’
  11. 77% Euthanasia Rate (2023)
    WDBJ7, "Danville Area Humane Society and local campaign at odds; both hoping to lower 77% kill rate" (September 10, 2024)
    View Source โ†’
  12. Excess Deaths Calculation
    Calculated from data: (65.8% - 14%) ร— 3,362 = 1,741 animals

Peer Shelter Data Sources

FOIA Documentation

Additional verification available through Freedom of Information Act documents obtained from DAHS, including:

  • Monthly custody records for 2023-2024
  • Euthanasia logs and calendars
  • Intake and outcome statistics

View FOIA Documents โ†’